Capital Planning & Risk
Risk-based capital prioritization
Quantified risk scoring that transforms capital planning from gut feel to defensible, data-driven priorities. Build board-ready CIPs backed by consequence and likelihood metrics your ratepayers can trust.
Risk Portfolio View
Every asset scored by Consequence × Likelihood
The Challenge
No defensible basis for capital prioritization — decisions based on gut feel, anecdotes, and squeaky wheels instead of system-wide risk metrics
See It In Action
Every asset scored by Consequence × Likelihood
Risk Portfolio View
Every asset scored by Consequence × Likelihood
What You Get
Risk = Consequence × Likelihood for every asset
Re-prioritize CIP based on quantified risk, not gut feel
Scenario modeling to compare mitigation strategies
Board-ready reports with defensible metrics
Problems This Solves
Sound familiar? You're not alone.
Capital Planning Driven by Gut Feel
CIP decisions based on anecdotes, recent failures, and squeaky wheels instead of system-wide risk data
Board Packets Rely on Subjective Rankings
Staff manually rank projects by consensus without quantifying consequence or likelihood of failure
Can't Defend Priorities to Ratepayers
When questioned why one neighborhood gets attention over another, utilities lack defensible data
Hydraulic Models Go Stale
Network changes, but the model doesn't — consultant studies become outdated the moment they're delivered
Powered by:
Ready to see it in action?
Let us show you how Capital Planning & Risk can work for your utility.